The Civic Commons Access to tools for building community where you live
Story · from the deliberation collection

vTaiwan: consensus at national scale

Taiwan's vTaiwan process pairs Pol.is opinion mapping with face-to-face deliberation: crowdsourced statements reveal rough consensus, then stakeholders meet to work the remaining tensions. It shaped national policy, most famously the ride-sharing rules.

Place: Taiwan.

vTaiwan remains the reference case for scaling listening without flattening it. Statements are crowdsourced and voted on in Pol.is until the opinion groups and the bridging statements are visible; then the people who disagree meet in person to work the parts the map could not settle. The ride-sharing (Uber) rules are the best-known outcome.

The pattern a neighborhood can borrow: opinion map online first, then work the hard parts face to face. The map is the agenda, not the decision.

Details

  • place: Taiwan
  • sources: https://compdemocracy.org/case-studies/vtaiwan/, https://compdemocracy.org/knowledge-base/
Related by topic

Contributed by Computational Democracy Project case study · compdemocracy.org/case-studies/vtaiwan

Original source: https://compdemocracy.org/case-studies/vtaiwan/

See something to fix or add? Suggest an edit on GitHub — the commons lives in git too, and its history is the changelog.

deliberationstorytaiwanpolisconsensus

Remix this in Relational Builder  Browse the commons