Dudley Street: 'How Many of You Live in This Neighborhood?'
One resident's question at a 1985 planning meeting forced a foundation-led initiative to hand its board to the neighborhood — which went on to win eminent domain over vacant land and build a community land trust with 225 permanently affordable homes.
By the early 1980s, arson-for-insurance and disinvestment had left about 1,300 vacant parcels — a fifth of the land — in Boston's Dudley Street neighborhood, which outsiders used as an illegal dump. Foundations and agencies arrived with a revitalization plan. At an early meeting in 1985, resident Ché Madyun stood up and asked the planners: 'How many of you live in this neighborhood?'
The question restructured the whole initiative. The Dudley Street Neighborhood Initiative rebuilt itself around a resident-majority board — 35 seats, elected every two years, with mandated parity across the neighborhood's four communities: African American, Cape Verdean, Latino, and white. Madyun became its president the next year. The first campaign was 'Don't Dump On Us' (1986): residents forced the city to close the illegal trash-transfer stations, tow the abandoned cars, and clean and fence the lots — a winnable first fight that proved the muscle.
Then the structural move: DSNI formed its land-holding arm, Dudley Neighbors Inc., in August 1988, and on November 10, 1988 the Boston Redevelopment Authority approved its application — making DSNI the first community group in the United States to win the power of eminent domain over vacant private land in the 62-acre Dudley Triangle. The land trust today holds about 30 acres: 225 permanently affordable homes, a community greenhouse, an urban farm, parks — the neighborhood's own phrase is 'development without displacement.'
What it teaches: governance design is a power question, not a formality. A resident-majority board with ethnic parity wasn't process decoration — it was the difference between a plan for the neighborhood and a plan by it. And the sequence matters: dumpsters before land trusts; a visible win before a structural one.
Details
- era: 1984–present
- place: Roxbury / North Dorchester, Boston
- illustrates: launch-a-team, campaign-timeline-peaks, tracking-down-the-power
- source note: Madyun's question and board structure per the National Park Service and DSNI's own timeline; eminent-domain approval dated by the BRA's Report and Decision of Nov. 10, 1988 (cited in Medoff & Sklar, 'Streets of Hope', 1994; DSNI's timeline agrees — some later retellings misdate the vote to 1989).
- practice kind: story
-
Recipe
A Strategy You Can Say Out Loud
If we do TACTICS, then CHANGE, because REASON. If your neighborhood campaign's theory of change doesn't fit in one honest sentence, it…
-
Build prompt
Build: A Debrief That Asks Both Questions
A starter build: an after-action tool that scores the goal honestly AND counts whether the community got stronger — new people, new…
-
Build prompt
Build: A Public Narrative Workshop
A starter build: walk a neighbor through the Story of Self / Us / Now worksheets — choice points, challenge-choice-outcome, and a hard ask…
-
Build prompt
Build: A Relational Map for Your Block
A starter build: a consent-respecting tool for answering 'who are my people?' — track your 1:1 conversations, what people care about, and…
-
Build prompt
Build: A Tracking-Down-the-Power Canvas
A starter build: a shared digital wall for the power-mapping exercise — map the actors around your issue, drag them across the field of…
Contributed by Ché Madyun & the residents of the Dudley Street neighborhood · National Park Service; DSNI's historic timeline; Medoff & Sklar, 'Streets of Hope' (1994)
Original source: https://www.nps.gov/mabi/learn/historyculture/che-madyun.htm
See something to fix or add? Suggest an edit on GitHub — the commons lives in git too, and its history is the changelog.
community-organizingorganizing-storylandgovernancequestion:what-commitments-do-we-makequestion:are-we-stronger-now